Large BioPharma makes equity investment in Oligonucleotides company

There is still lots of interest in finding a cure for myotonic dystrophy through oligonucleotides. These are small molecules different than oral ingestion of a pill. Lots of interest in this type of therapy. Here is a press release from bioworld

Lilly’s ‘Avidity’ for oligos pays off for Calif.-based company

Share
web_pic_4-23.jpg

By Michael Fitzhugh
News Editor

Eli Lilly and Co. has agreed to pay privately held Avidity Biosciences LLC $20 million up front and up to $405 million per target to support development of an unspecified number of new antibody oligonucleotide conjugates for immunology and other indications. The multiyear deal, which also includes a $15 million equity investment for Avidity, opens a new front in Lilly’s embrace of oligonucleotide-based drugs, the subject of earlier deals it has struck with Dicerna Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ionis Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Noxxon Pharma AG.

Avidity’s platform, which can leverage transferrin and other transporters to deliver oligonucleotides into multiple tissue types, will allow Lilly to reach beyond hepatocytes — the most accessible domain for such medicines so far — to muscle, heart, tumor and immune cells. Andrew Adams, Lilly’s chief scientific officer for RNA therapeutics, called it “a promising avenue of research toward development of new RNA-based medicines.” With Lilly’s own multimillion-dollar R&D center just up the road from Avidity’s La Jolla, Calif., headquarters, the big pharma company’s scientists won’t even have to drive far.

Arthur Levin, Avidity’s head of R&D, told BioWorld the deal “demonstrates that the technology for oligonucleotides has reached the level of maturity where pharma is jumping back in” while validating Avidity’s technology, too. “The field has made great strides recently using targeted approaches to deliver to hepatocytes. Our technology allows us to deliver oligonucleotide payloads to cells outside of simply hepatocytes, and that’s what attracted Lilly,” he said.

The company also brings expertise in what Kent Hawryluk, Avidity’s chief business officer, told BioWorld are some of “the devilish technical details” that would make it difficult for someone to replicate its approach.

“Each one of the components, the antibody, the conjugation to the antibody, the linker, the nature of the payload, the arrangement of the molecules in space… each one of those is important to optimize,” said Levin. “If you just go in and slap an oligonucleotide payload onto an antibody, you’re probably not going to get the results that we get. That’s where the secret sauce lies, in that combination of making the appropriate modifications to each one of those systems,” he said.

Including the new equity investment by Lilly, Avidity has now raised $50 million from investors including Takeda Ventures, Alethea Capital, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Brace Pharma, Ecor1 Capital, F-Prime Capital, Moore Venture Partners and Boxer Capital of Tavistock Group. Takeda led the company’s series B round.

The global licensing and R&D agreement with Lilly is the company’s first strategic deal and will provide it not only with support for the partnered candidate, but with nondilutive funding to help advance its muscle-focused internal pipeline.

“It turns out that muscle cells are particularly sensitive to molecules transported in on the transferrin receptor and that’s why we’ve concentrated our lead programs on muscle,” said Levin.

Founded as Avidity Nanomedicines in 2013, the company tweaked its name to reflect that its approach could do more than just deliver siRNAs, an early focus of Avidity Nanomedicines. Today, its lead internal program is focused on myotonic dystrophy type 1, a disease caused by the expansion of CTG repeats in the DMPK gene. Following humanization of an anti-human transferrin receptor antibody, Avidity team members on the project are now working to optimize its siRNA payload. “We’re in the process of scaling up the antibody and moving forward with respect to development in the very near future,” said Levin.

Avidity is also applying its antibody oligonucleotide conjugate technology to Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) where the company said its approach has proved 100-fold more potent than existing oligonucleotide therapies for DMD in a mouse model of the disease, a feat it hopes will allow for reduced dose levels and reduced dosing frequency. In October, the company received an undisclosed equity investment from Cureduchenne to help advance preclinical development of its exon-skipping oligonucleotides for DMD.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Clinical Diagnosis Protocol – Consotorium (in Spanish)

This is a paper that is the sesult of a meeting of doctors in Spain and a consortium of ideas on how to diagnosis myotonic dystrophy. It is in Spanish

Clinical-Guide-to-disagnosing-Myotonic-dystrophy

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Lung Function and Myotonic Dystrophy

A consortium of doctors met and came up with some definitive pathways for patients with myotonic dystrophy

A Multi-country conference was held with doctor from most major European Countries and the USA to review respiratory or lung function in patients with Myotonic Dystrophy. Patients with DM have a lot of issues with lung function and respiration. A framework or step by step checklist was reviewed and recommended at this conference. The conclusion of this conference is presented below. This is a very complex subject so print this and bring it with you to your doctor or  pulmonologist. When you have myotonic dystrophy its important to have your lung function checked every 6 months or so.

Respiratory-insufficiency-in-Myotonic-Dystrophy

Management of respiratory insufficiency is challenging in
DM because of the pathophysiology of the disease, which
affects both muscles and central respiratory pathways and
patients’ cognitive and behavioral characteristics. Although
there are no natural history data on the effects of respiratory
care on survival and on morbidity in patients with DM, results
of ventilation on survival and on better care in other
neuromuscular diseases indicate that adequate ventilatory care
may improve survival and QoL of patients with DM1 [41–43].
NIV use varies greatly among the different centers, e.g. varying
from 20 to 60% in adults with DM1, 20–40% of patients with
the congenital form, and 15–20% of patients with DM2. All
participants agreed on the need for standard assessments and
recommendations for standard of care.
Discussion between the specialists from different countries
led to the construction of initial standard protocols which are
the necessary preliminary steps for validation processes to
follow. Specifically, the workshop led to the creation of: 1) a
respiratory symptom check-list to be applied in everyday DM
clinic (Table 1); 2) a preliminary version of a screening
respiratory protocol to be applied on first assessment during
clinic (Figure 1); 3) proposal of criteria for NIV prescription to
be used specifically in patients with DM, based on the existing
ACI (Consensus Statement from the Agency for Clinical
Innovation Respiratory Network on Domiciliary Non-Invasive
Ventilation in Adult Patients) guidelines for NIV, including
recommendations for timing and tests to be performed on
follow-up assessments; 4) proposal of a secretion management
protocol (Figure 2).
The need for validation of these recommendations and for
further research to extend the evidence-base in certain key areas
was also highlighted and outline proposals to resolve these
deficiencies put forward. All participants agreed on the urge for
more natural history data and for specific pathways for
emergency care of acute respiratory insufficiency in DM.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Falling Down and Myotonic Dystrophy

falling down in myotonic dystrophy

New information available that will help lend insite into this pervasive problem with myotonic dystrophy. Here is the link to the full study https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960896617314037

Highlights

  • This is the first high scale survey for falls and fractures for Myotonic Dystrophy 1.
  • DM1 adults showed 2.3 more risk of falling than a healthy adult over 65 years of age.
  • These results presented no impact of respondent sex for risk of falls.
  • Age showed to be a significant predictor for falls in DM1.
  • Falls in DM1 are still an unpredicted & underestimated factor that requires attention.

Abstract

Myotonic Dystrophy type 1 multisystem involvement leads to functional impairment with an increased risk of falling. This multinational study estimates the prevalence of falls and fall-associated fractures. A web-based survey among disease-specific registries (Germany, UK and The Netherlands) was carried out among DM1 ambulant adults with a total of 573 responses retrieved. Results provided a risk ratio estimation of 30%–72% for falls and of 11%–17% for associated fractures. There was no significant difference for falls between male and female, but there was for fall-related fractures with a higher prevalence in women. Balance and leg weakness were the most commonly reported causes for falling. This study is based on a voluntary retrospective survey with naturally inherent limitations; however, the sample size allows for robust comparisons. The estimated risk of falls in this cohort with a mean age of 46 years compares to a previous estimation for a healthy population of over 65 years of age. These results suggest a premature-ageing DM1 phenotype with an increased risk of falling depending on age and disease severity that, so far, might have been underestimated. This may have clinical implications for the development of care guidelines and when testing new interventions in this population.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Review Article on Myotonic Dystrophy

A new article was published on myotonic dystrophy from a number of researchers in Spain. This was a broad review by many specialists. We do not yet have a full review of the article but when the full article is available we will review it more thoroughly. Here are a few key conclusions:

The genetic diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy should quantify the number of CTG repetitions. -reason this gives some idea of the severity of the disease

Myotonic Dystrophy patients need cardiac and respiratory lifetime follow-up. These symtoms get worse with time and must be tracked

Before any surgery under general anaesthesia, a respiratory evaluation must be done for myotonic dystrophy patients. surgery is serious and the anesthesiologist needs to know the strength of the respiratory system.

Dysphagia in myotonic dystrophy must be screened periodically. – This can cause severe problems and can give an idea of the progression fo the disease

Genetic counselling must be offered to patients and relatives with myotonic dystrophy.

Here is the abstract from pubmed

Neurologia. 2019 Apr 16. pii: S0213-4853(19)30019-2. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2019.01.001. [Epub ahead of print]

Clinical guide for the diagnosis and follow-up of myotonic dystrophy type 1, MD1 or Steinert’s disease.

[Article in English, Spanish]Gutiérrez Gutiérrez G1Díaz-Manera J2Almendrote M3Azriel S4Eulalio Bárcena J5Cabezudo García P6Camacho Salas A7Casanova Rodríguez C8Cobo AM9Díaz Guardiola P4Fernández-Torrón R10Gallano Petit MP11García Pavía P12Gómez Gallego M13Gutiérrez Martínez AJ14Jericó I15Kapetanovic García S16López de Munaín Arregui A17Martorell L18Morís de la Tassa G19Moreno Zabaleta R20Muñoz-Blanco JL21Olivar Roldán J4Pascual Pascual SI21Peinado Peinado R22Pérez H23Poza Aldea JJ10Rabasa M24Ramos A3Rosado Bartolomé A25Rubio Pérez MÁ26Urtizberea JA9Zapata-Wainberg G27Gutiérrez-Rivas E28.

Author information

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:

Steinert’s disease or myotonic dystrophy type 1 (MD1), (OMIM 160900), is the most prevalent myopathy in adults. It is a multisystemic disorder with dysfunction of virtually all organs and tissues and a great phenotypical variability, which implies that it has to be addressed by different specialities with experience in the disease. The knowledge of the disease and its management has changed dramatically in recent years. This guide tries to establish recommendations for the diagnosis, prognosis, follow-up and treatment of the complications of MD1.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

Consensus guide developed through a multidisciplinary approach with a systematic literature review. Neurologists, pulmonologists, cardiologists, endocrinologists, neuropaediatricians and geneticists have participated in the guide.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

The genetic diagnosis should quantify the number of CTG repetitions. MD1 patients need cardiac and respiratory lifetime follow-up. Before any surgery under general anaesthesia, a respiratory evaluation must be done. Dysphagia must be screened periodically. Genetic counselling must be offered to patients and relatives.

CONCLUSION:

MD1 is a multisystemic disease that requires specialised multidisciplinary follow-up.

Copyright © 2018 Sociedad Española de Neurología. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

KEYWORDS:

Clinical guideline; Complicaciones; Complications; Disfagia; Distrofia miotónica tipo 1; Dysphagia; Enfermedad de Steinert; Guía clínica; Myotonic dystrophy type 1; Recomendaciones; Recommendations; Steinert’s disease

Print Friendly, PDF & Email